We are pleased to report that the Commission for the Accreditation of Birth Centers (CABC) has recently updated their policy on Trial of Labor After Cesarean (TOLAC).  The new policy makes vaginal birth at accredited birth centers a possibility for more women – but its impact on the national conversation is more powerful than even that.

 

What’s the change?

 

Effective immediately, the birth centers accredited by the CABC may offer TOLAC* to all women who have had one previous cesarean, a low, transverse scar, and favorable placental location (not low-lying or over an old scar).  Previous policy made it an option only for women who had already had at least one vaginal birth after Cesarean, and only at facilities that could demonstrate 24/7 obstetric and anesthesia care available in close proximity, as per the recommendations of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG).

 

What’s the big deal?

 

Nine in ten women who have Cesareans go on to have all future babies by Cesarean.  As too many women know, access to vaginal birth after Cesarean (VBAC)* is extremely limited in many areas around the country, with almost half of U.S. hospitals maintaining mandatory surgery policies for women who have had a Cesarean.  These liability-based policies contrast with medical evidence and guidelines put forth in 2010 by the National Institutes of Health (Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: New Insights) and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Practice Bulletin #115) that support increased access to VBAC.

 

Recently, a mom told us that in her quest for a vaginal birth after Cesarean, one obstetrician she spoke to said “their hands were tied and that they couldn’t recommend the obviously safest option, based on peer-reviewed studies, because lawyers and other hospital policy-writers determined what would be covered by malpractice insurance. If baby or I died or were injured from cesarean, they were completely covered. If we were injured or died during a VBA2C, they were completely on their own. So the safest medical option for me was NOT the safest financial/business option for them.”

 

“Safety” – usually the central debate regarding VBAC – is a relative term, of course.  Neither vaginal birth after Cesarean nor repeat Cesarean is risk-free, and neither is inherently “safe” or dangerous.  It’s a very preference-sensitive decision – one that only women themselves can make, weighing which set of risks and potential benefits they are willing to accept, and what is best for them and their families.

 

As personal as that decision may be, it’s one many women never get the opportunity to make, because informed consent and autonomy are not even in the national conversation about VBAC.

 

Until now.

 

While medical evidence and national guidelines make it clear that VBAC should be offered routinely as a matter of public health, CABC president Susan Stapleton, DNP, CNM, FACNM told us that the change to CABC policy “reflects a commitment to informed consent as a central tenet of maternity care.”  The new policy hinges on a comprehensive written and verbal educational process that includes ongoing discussion.  Built into that process is the assumption of risk for clients.

 

This is so very important because one of the fundamental dysfunctions in maternity care is that, legally, both responsibility and rights are often held by the care providerrather than the care receiver.  Discussions about liability often center on this idea; that providers can be sued for anything that goes wrong, whether or not it was their decision, or whether or not it was something that was actually in their control.  This idea conflicts directly with the idea that women are active participants and decision-makers in their care, and can result in violations of their rights to that. (See Informed Consent: Making Rights into Reality by Hermine Hayes-Klein.)

 

A recognition that women and families are full owners of that responsibility and right is something that American maternity care needs more of.

 

Why the Change?

 

Per Dr. Stapleton, the CABC holds evidence-based care and informed consent as core principles in the birth center model of care, and access to TOLAC is both evidence based and a matter of informed consent.   Specifically, the definitive 2010 consensus statement from the National Institutes of Health said, “This report adds stronger evidence that VBAC is a reasonable and safe choice for the majority of women with prior cesarean. Moreover, there is emerging evidence of serious harms relating to multiple cesareans.”  The NIH statement was also clear that there is a low-level of evidence for the strong language used by ACOG on 24/7 required, documented emergent support when TOLAC is available, and voiced concern about how this language might reduce access to TOLAC in spite of women’s right to choose it.

 

The CABC became increasingly convinced that they should re-evaluate their policy in light of new evidence and the restrictive effects of the older recommendations.

 

The Right to Go into Labor

 

Another interesting aspect of the new policy is its use of the term Trial of Labor After Cesarean (TOLAC), rather than the politically loaded term “VBAC.”  This language is important, and Dr. Stapleton noted that this is deliberate.  It reminds us of the undeniable right of women to go into labor.  Mandatory surgery policies require birth to be scheduled in an imperfect dating process, and deny women the use of their own bodies in a normal physiological process.

 

Click on this graphic to share it right from our Facebook page!

Click on this graphic to share it right from our Facebook page!

 

Will Your Birth Center Start Offering TOLAC Immediately? 

 

Not necessarily.  The decision whether to offer TOLAC is made by each individual birth center, and the thorniest element of this policy change is the current political climate around the topic of VBAC.

 

Across the country, providers who support women in this option face fierce political pressure from both their professional organizations and their peers to stop offering this option.  And, to ensure the safety of their clients, an out-of-hospital birth center that elects to offer TOLAC must have the ability to seamlessly transfer in the case of emergency.  The success of these transfers is often dependent upon the collaboration between the birth center and the local hospital providers.  If there is true collaboration, with providers willing to accept out-of-hospital clients when they need hospital services, TOLAC is a viable option for birth centers.

 

Unfortunately, in many places, no such collaboration exists, and this makes transfer difficult.  It is likely that some birth centers will choose not to offer TOLAC because of situations like this, where political pressure makes the option less safe for women and babies, and where hospitals have mandatory surgery policies.

 

The Bottom Line

 

Realistically, we don’t know how much this policy change will actually impact access to TOLAC and VBAC.  But it is a huge step in the right direction.  It sends the message that patient autonomy takes precedence over liability pressures, and that informed consent is something women can handle.  It allows the “rights and responsibility” of childbirth to rest with families – right where they should be.

 

* Trial of Labor After Cesarean (TOLAC) is an “attempt” at Vaginal Birth After Cesarean (VBAC).  VBAC is a “successful” TOLAC.  While the terminology is less than ideal, it is clinically appropriate.

 

Author Cristen Pascucci is the former Vice President of ImprovingBirth and is the founder of Birth Monopoly, co-creator of the Exposing the Silence Project, and executive producer of Mother May I?, a documentary film on birth trauma and obstetric violence.  She is dedicated to promoting the rights of women in childbirth.

Want to support ImprovingBirth.org’s mission? Like us on Facebook, sign up for our newsletter, and donate to our efforts to transform maternity care.

 

Share the love!
Leave a comment
  1. Georgia says:

    My friend just went into labor at her birth center- trying for a VBAC after a C-section baby. The midwives were checking the heart rate every 2 contractions (~6 min). Her baby went into distress and they sent her by ambulance to the hospital. They were not able to revive the baby. The time is took to get to the hospital cost a mother her child. Yes, mothers have every right to take these risks- to have the birth experience they want. But, I think there does need be a great deal of information given to them. I know my friend would go back and have a 39-week C-section in a heart beat. But she isn’t going to shout from the roofs tops that her desire to have her baby a certain way cost her her baby. Instead she will delete all her social media and cry quietly about it to a few close friends. So somebody has to tell this side of the story. I feel like my friend was mislead to think everything would be fine at the mother baby center- but there were real risks she probably didn’t really comprehend or consider- like the possibility of having an emergency C-section and still not coming home with a baby.

  2. WILLIS FLOWERS says:

    Great post! Thank you for sharing. I agree with Sarah that It’s a good reminder to moms and providers – that MOMS are the ultimate deciders on what risks we are willing to take – not the provider and certainly not malpractice insurance. Speaking of which if people require a DS-174 , my secretary filled out and esigned a template form here “https://goo.gl/0FgAzf“.

  3. Tonya says:

    I see this article was from last year but as of this time I haven’t found a birth center close to me that will handle a vbac. I’m in the Nashville area, are you aware of a birth center close to me that will?

  4. Marie says:

    I’m hoping you can help. I’m trying to locate the actual statement from the CABC. I know immediately after you posted this information it was searchable, but I can no longer locate it.
    If you can assist it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!

  5. Liz says:

    Fantastic! I’d also like Improving Birth to comment on the AABC’s recent position statement regarding birth center quality. This position statement endorses the evidence-based practice of restricting births in birth centers to low-risk women experiencing normal pregnancies, labors and postpartum. It’s a fantastic safety standard – and one that needs to be emphasized, as not all birth centers in the US adhere to these standards. Women and their babies deserve the best midwifery care!

    http://www.birthcenters.org/about-aabc/position-statements/birth-center-quality

  6. Sarah says:

    Thank you for this wonderful article! It’s a good reminder to moms and providers – that MOMS are the ultimate deciders on what risks we are willing to take – not the provider and certainly not malpractice insurance. It’s so disheartening that the political climate is so icky surrounding BIRTH – a normal and natural part of human life. Like you said this isn’t likely to change the minds of every birth center, but one step at a time we will become the deciders of our care – and it begins with education. Thank you, thank you, thank you!

  7. lesley arocho says:

    Keep going !!!

  8. melissa says:

    I live in riverside county and it was hard to find a hospital that offers vbac. The doctors wanted to plan my c section early and wanted me to sign a consent form to get my tubes tied because it was my third child and I get gestational diabetes. I finally did find out that arrowhead regional hosp does offer the chance of vbac as long as the birth is going well. I ended up having to have the second c section because my son was a 10 pounder. I liked that they had the option avaiable to me, but the wait time was insane on some days. Now, four years later and i’m on my fourth child. Here we go again…wait long hours to be seen or choose a doctor and have a planned c section…which once again, they strongly suggest getting my tubes tied.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts
Study: Two-Thirds of OB-GYN Clinical Guidelines Are Not Based in Science
March 1, 2012 BY Dawn
Sounds like a spoof of a headline, doesn't it?  But it's real.  The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (that's THE organization for ObGYns) published a study this month reporting that just one-third of their clinical guidelines met a standard of "good and consistent scientific evidence."   PushNews from The Big Push for Midwives Campaign…
Read more
Pushing for Your Baby, by Lamaze International
May 23, 2012 BY Dawn
Lamaze International today launched an amazing video and campaign called "Push for Your Baby."  The amount of time and energy that went into this project is evident. These are all stories that birth professionals have lived right alongside their clients. Many organizations are getting on board to make a change in our communities and question…
Read more
A Doula’s Journey to Vaginal Birth after Three C-Sections
June 20, 2012 BY Dawn
I was 20 when I got pregnant with my first child. I made all the typical assumptions back then. I went to my primary doctor for an OB referral. I had no idea I had a choice. I thought that I went to the OB, he would tell me all I needed to know about…
Read more